Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Thanks for telling me its strength is not positional!

Author: stuart taylor

Date: 19:25:40 01/14/06

Go up one level in this thread


On January 14, 2006 at 22:11:01, Albert Silver wrote:

>On January 14, 2006 at 21:50:14, stuart taylor wrote:
>
>>I had been under the impression that Rybka's main strength was positional, and
>>that others came no where near it. I thought I had heard it was tactically good
>>too.
>>But thanks for letting me know it was purely tactical. I had been under the
>>impression for some reason that the ice was beginning to be broken from the
>>stagnation of some of chess computing weaknesses.
>>So there is still way to go, and Rybka might yet be succeeded by about another
>>200 elo, by positional improvement alone!
>>S.Taylor
>
>He's wrong.
>
>      Albert

I thought Zappa was himself a great expert and programmer.
S.Taylor



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.