Author: James T. Walker
Date: 09:30:28 01/15/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 15, 2006 at 07:40:53, Richard Blood wrote: >I ran a test on my other 2.8 ghz celeron p4 1 gb ram pc ! I ran a swiss >tournament in a 20 game match ! 128 hash , No book , Default paremeters ! > >Rybka 1.01 Beta 10 13.5-20 >Rybka 1.01 Beta 9 6.5-20 > >Clearly Rybka and its creator are on the right track ! This engine is not only a >human killer its a engine destroyer it's self ! My total respect to the team >rybka and my loyalty as a customer ! I see no major difference between Beta 9 and Beta 10d but Beta 10 was broke in my opinion. I played an 80 blitz game match with the 3 Rybka versions vs Shredder 8(2cpus) using auto232. The Rybka programs ran on an AMD XP2400+ while Shredder 8(2cpus) ran on an AMD 64x2/3800+. Here are the results: Rybka Beta 9(32Bit) vs Shredder 8(2cpus) 47.5-32.5 Rybka Beta 10(32bit) vs Shredder 8(2cpus) 39.0-41.0 Rybka Beta 10d(32bit) vs Shredder 8(2cpus) 48.0-32.0 Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.