Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 09:36:30 01/15/06
Go up one level in this thread
Excuse me that I as nobody come into that parallelism debate. I have a general question for you that could make things better understandable IMO. Often I read here messages of tht sort that such and such result could not be used at all because this isnt regulated etc. pp. Let me ask you a basic question to your classes. If you want to make students understand that they can make experiments and can compare the results - ALTHOUGH as you just mentioned, even the very same behavior cannot be expected in case of parallel processors, how do you do that education? What is the important point to understand, so that it's then almost easy to understand? In general it's the question if and when, under what conditions, one is allowed to make conclusions, in what form, and when it's no more allowed? Could you give a couple of statements? - I ask because I come from a little debate with Albert, who is doubting that a little test by Marc would make no sense insofar one couldnt take the results into any other area. I said that his experiment and also the results of course had a meaning. Could you perhaps include that totally different question into your explanation? What is data worth and what can we do with it furthermore? Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.