Author: Vasik Rajlich
Date: 10:14:49 01/15/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2006 at 17:15:39, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: >Hi folks, > >I am just wondering how much improvement vasik has managed from the original >beta and the newest beta (please post anything you have). My initial tests >against fritz 9 show (4 min 2 sec increment); noomen openings): > >rybka beta 10 37 - 22 >rybka beta 35.5 - 23.5 > > >(this tourni still going, will post final results soon.) > >My guess is vasik has maybe improved rybka by 30 points (please present any data >you have since this is truley guessing.) > >I am not sure that adding endgame knowledge will lead to big improvement. Maybe >a half point here or there, but i could be wrong. Maybe 20 point boost? > >Let's say the February release of rybka gets a total of 50 points improvement. >This will give it about a 90 point advantage over fruit, based on the CEGT. If >fabien keeps improving fruit as he has in the past (see >http://www.fruitchess.com/playing-strength.htm), then fruit could very well >catch rybka in the next release. > > >I really like the way Fruit 2.2. plays. It offers you very solid advice and >seems to understand opening play quite well (will post data on this soon). In >playing style, it seems very different from rybka and thus forms a nice >complement to this monster fish. > > >best >Joseph > >ps. did fabien ever offer an explanation about why on earth he called his >program fruit. Actually, I am surprised that nobody has run a huge match to test Beta 10 vs Beta 1. Ok, I've run this match now - but my data is secret :) As for Fruit 3.0 in March - my wild guess is 100 ELO points. Vas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.