Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:02:15 01/15/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 15, 2006 at 13:14:49, Vasik Rajlich wrote: >On January 14, 2006 at 17:15:39, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: > >>Hi folks, >> >>I am just wondering how much improvement vasik has managed from the original >>beta and the newest beta (please post anything you have). My initial tests >>against fritz 9 show (4 min 2 sec increment); noomen openings): >> >>rybka beta 10 37 - 22 >>rybka beta 35.5 - 23.5 >> >> >>(this tourni still going, will post final results soon.) >> >>My guess is vasik has maybe improved rybka by 30 points (please present any data >>you have since this is truley guessing.) >> >>I am not sure that adding endgame knowledge will lead to big improvement. Maybe >>a half point here or there, but i could be wrong. Maybe 20 point boost? >> >>Let's say the February release of rybka gets a total of 50 points improvement. >>This will give it about a 90 point advantage over fruit, based on the CEGT. If >>fabien keeps improving fruit as he has in the past (see >>http://www.fruitchess.com/playing-strength.htm), then fruit could very well >>catch rybka in the next release. >> >> >>I really like the way Fruit 2.2. plays. It offers you very solid advice and >>seems to understand opening play quite well (will post data on this soon). In >>playing style, it seems very different from rybka and thus forms a nice >>complement to this monster fish. >> >> >>best >>Joseph >> >>ps. did fabien ever offer an explanation about why on earth he called his >>program fruit. > >Actually, I am surprised that nobody has run a huge match to test Beta 10 vs >Beta 1. Ok, I've run this match now - but my data is secret :) > >As for Fruit 3.0 in March - my wild guess is 100 ELO points. > >Vas My wild guess is that 100 elo is not going to be enough to catch rybka even if we talk only about the 32 bit version. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.