Author: Joseph Ciarrochi
Date: 11:44:23 01/15/06
Go up one level in this thread
I ran a 100 game match with f9 versus rybka bettas. 4 min 2 sec It was rybka beta 9b (Vasik says 9b is the same as 10) 59.5 - 40.5 rybka beta 58- 42 I also ran a comparison of rybka beta with rybka beta 10 in a no book tournement.(openings were 1 as d4, e4, c4, and nf3). this was 25 min 1 sec tournmenet Rybka beta 9b/10 23- 40 rybka beta 1 24.5- 40 Could there a big difference between 10 and 10d? Your results suggest yes..but what the heck did vasik change in the 12 hours between the release of 10 and 10d best J On January 15, 2006 at 12:30:28, James T. Walker wrote: >On January 15, 2006 at 07:40:53, Richard Blood wrote: > >>I ran a test on my other 2.8 ghz celeron p4 1 gb ram pc ! I ran a swiss >>tournament in a 20 game match ! 128 hash , No book , Default paremeters ! >> >>Rybka 1.01 Beta 10 13.5-20 >>Rybka 1.01 Beta 9 6.5-20 >> >>Clearly Rybka and its creator are on the right track ! This engine is not only a >>human killer its a engine destroyer it's self ! My total respect to the team >>rybka and my loyalty as a customer ! > >I see no major difference between Beta 9 and Beta 10d but Beta 10 was broke in >my opinion. I played an 80 blitz game match with the 3 Rybka versions vs >Shredder 8(2cpus) using auto232. The Rybka programs ran on an AMD XP2400+ while >Shredder 8(2cpus) ran on an AMD 64x2/3800+. Here are the results: > >Rybka Beta 9(32Bit) vs Shredder 8(2cpus) 47.5-32.5 >Rybka Beta 10(32bit) vs Shredder 8(2cpus) 39.0-41.0 >Rybka Beta 10d(32bit) vs Shredder 8(2cpus) 48.0-32.0 >Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.