Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: why did ruffian fail to keep pace?

Author: Tony Thomas Karippa

Date: 12:30:43 01/15/06

Go up one level in this thread

On January 15, 2006 at 13:23:03, Gabor Szots wrote:

>>>>rybkachess.com is prob the best engine to todays date that is improved everytime
>>>>a new version comes out !
>>>
>>>You meant Fruit, didn't you?
>>
>>Couldn't help it, huh? =)
>
>>AY.
>
>You know me, it seems. :-)
>
>At the same time, facts are facts. Fruit improved 50-100 Elos with every new
>release, while there is practically no difference in strength between Rybka 1.0
>Beta and the commercial releases.
>
>Gábor
Well, I dont think the Rybka programmer is trying to increase the stregth. He
even said to use the the first beta for tournmaents since it has been tested
more and I dont see him adding any strength increasing features yet. May be the
J. Noomen book will give it few extra elos. As for the ruffian programmer, I
think he is dead.
Tony

• Re: why did ruffian fail to keep pace? Roman Hartmann 15:14:48 01/15/06
  • Re: why did ruffian fail to keep pace? Tony Thomas Karippa 22:43:42 01/15/06

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.