Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:22:29 01/16/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 15, 2006 at 08:56:28, Albert Silver wrote: > >>and my opinion is that you have a better chance to get a reply to a question >>like which engine improve more from more time. > >Not even that (see my reply above), however there is no need for this. If you >want to know whether an engine is a proportionately better blitz player than at >standard time control, you can simply consult the CEGT lists. There is one >dedicated to blitz games (40moves in 4 mins) and another for standard games (40 >moves in 40 mins). You can easily see whether one engine doing much better in >one list than the other. > > Albert I now understand your mistake. I was talking about the data that marc give in the post that I replied and not the real data. Based on the real data you could learn nothing Based on the data that he gave in the post I replied to you could learn something. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.