Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Hash Table size Limit if any

Author: Roger Brown

Date: 11:37:23 01/16/06

Go up one level in this thread


On January 16, 2006 at 14:03:54, Joshua Lee wrote:

>I have 4GB for main Memory, I am running Windows X64
>the only 64-bit chess program i have to my knowledge is Crafty.
>Chessbase and my Copy of Deep Shredder 9 are 32 bit.
>
>Right Now I have a Single Dual Core 270 Opteron (2Ghz each core) i have an empty
>cpu slot and 4 more memory slots.
>I use 2Gb for Hash Tables and if i try to do anything else with my computer i
>get Virtual Memory problems. It's not that i really need to check my email or
>surf the Web when i am analyzing chess positions i am just uncertain why 2 Extra
>GB isn't enough for the entire system.
>
>The plan was to populate all Memory slots get another 4GB you can get 8 x 2GB
>chips but that's really expensive.
>
>I would hope that NUMA and 4 extra GB would  make a huge difference but i am
>just asking opinions here.    1 would 16GB really be overkill Vs 8GB compared to
>what i have now and
>2 do you see any difference with NUMA etc.
>
>
>Thankyou


Hello Joshua,

Systems such as the one you describe are totally outside my experience.  I
cannot even conceive of the hash sizes you mention so casually in your post.

In fact I am filled with envy.

Here is hoping Dr Hyatt, Gian Carlo or Vincent can answer you.

No insult intended to other members who can speak the numa language.

:-)

Later.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.