Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Deep Shredder (2 processors) x Rybka ?

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 11:40:08 01/16/06

Go up one level in this thread


On January 16, 2006 at 11:23:59, Albert Silver wrote:

>On January 16, 2006 at 00:25:03, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On January 15, 2006 at 23:21:31, Albert Silver wrote:
>>
>>>>But in general, deeper search is stronger than shallower search, all else being
>>>>equal.
>>>
>>>Reading this threw me off on a funny tangent, because in my mind I automatically
>>>added "until it makes no difference", meaning that if a possible path to victory
>>>or draw exists from a certain position, it will be found. So if a 70-ply deep
>>>engine could find all the right moves, then a 75-ply deep engine would make no
>>>difference.
>>>
>>>Anyhow, I then wondered whether the phenomenon of diminishing returns wasn't in
>>>fact the ultimate sign that perfect chess is ultimately a draw. After all, if
>>>chess was ultimately a big 1-0 then greater depth and precision (drawing closer
>>>to this perfect win) should lead to more wins and losses and not less, no?
>>>
>>>                                       Albert
>>
>>
>>Interesting thought.  Although you are thinking straight line, when it might be
>>a curve that first flattens for a long while appearing to be settling in on a
>>draw score, but going even deeper suddenly accelerates the curve back toward
>>winning again...
>
>Yes, I had thought of something like this but on a slightly different line: that
>the paths to absolute victory (should it exist) are extremely few, thus the
>greater number of draws are related to the genuinely drawn nature of that
>majority.
>
>>
>>But I would not be surprised if it ended up as a dead draw with perfect play.
>>Although when you think about the game, one simple tempi ought not be enough to
>>win, if the world is fair.  :)
>
>Still, I agree and personally believe that with perfect play on both sides, a
>draw would be the result.
>
>                                       Albert


Now if we can just one day test that hypothesis, preferably with a computer
program.  :)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.