Author: Vasik Rajlich
Date: 06:08:08 01/17/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 16, 2006 at 10:49:39, P. Massie wrote: >Although it's a long way from a scientific or statiscally valid sample, I have >seen what appears to be a dramatic difference with the 10x Beta. I haven't been >playing matches, but rather analyzing GM games with it. That's why this is not >scientific or statiscally valid. My observation is that it finds the correct >move (or at least as close as any of the engines can come to the correct move) >much more quickly than the competitors. It's not so much that it finds better >moves so often, but rather it finds the right move within seconds, where Fritz >9, Hiarcs 10 or earlier Rybka may take minutes. Having said that, I also think >it finds the right move more often, although that could just be a factor of >time. The others might also find just as much, given enough time. > >When I started using the 10x Beta I was struck by how often it picked the same >move as the GM - and within seconds. > >Paul Thanks. Indeed the Beta 10 search should be better at finding new things more quickly, in some cases several orders of magnitude faster. Vas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.