Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 12:18:00 01/17/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 17, 2006 at 15:11:24, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: >I find it difficult to empircally demonstrate that programs differ in their >relative ranking, depending on time (not including time controls below 4 minutes >mind you, where wierd stuff does happen). Ponder is kind of like increasing time >to think. > > For example, the cegt blitz ratings correlate .99 with the CEGT longer time >controls. > >I would love to see evidence of changes in rank due to differences is ponder or >time. > >maybe hiarcs 10 hyper modern is a candidate for being better at blitz. e.g., >check out its standard rating >(http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/cegtrating4040all.html) > > versus its blitz rating (http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/eloblitzall.html) > >Fruit, in contrast, may be a little weaker in blitz. Ktulu 75 seems to prosper at 40/120 in my tests. Glaurung 1.01 seems to prosper at blitz in my tests.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.