Author: Heinz van Kempen
Date: 08:47:03 01/18/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 18, 2006 at 11:32:17, Per Jørgensen wrote: >On January 18, 2006 at 10:58:16, Heinz van Kempen wrote: > >>On January 18, 2006 at 10:53:42, Per Jørgensen wrote: >> >>>On January 18, 2006 at 10:47:42, Heinz van Kempen wrote: >>> >>>>On January 18, 2006 at 10:37:24, Per Jørgensen wrote: >>>> >>>>>Does anyone know if "Hiarcs 10 Hypermodern" at CEGT Rating means a)Hypermodern >>>>>ON and everything else default or b)Hypermodern ON and also changes of other >>>>>variables? >>>>> >>>>>Regards >>>>>Per >>>> >>>>Hi Per, >>>> >>>>only Hypermodern tagged, all other parameters are default like proposed by >>>>Enrico Carrisco. If we will have the CPU time to test also the TC settings I >>>>cannot tell for the moment, because we are just planning a team tournament which >>>>will follow after the leagues. >>>> >>>>Best Regards >>>>Heinz >>> >>>Hi Heinz! >>> >>>Thanks for your quick reply. I am just about to start a longer testseries myself >>>and I'll go for the Hypermodern-seting as well. >>> >>>Good luck with your excellent testwork. >>> >>>Best regards >>>Per >> >>Hi Per, >> >>as far as I know you are playing with predefined positions. What will be the >>time control and hardware? >> >>Best Regards >>Heinz > >Hi Heinz! > >Yes, it is true that I am playing with predefined openingpositions and I will >continue to do so. Basicly I have been satisfied with my testing so far. >However, I have realised that testing 40/14 repeadetly is too timedemanding when >you yourself are the only tester. Moreover, I discovered that some of my >openingpositions haven't been working too well (especially Ben Oni in which the >White-score exceeded 70%) and I have also come to the conclusion that I prefer >10 predefined openingpositions in stead of 15. It's almost decided which 10 >predefined openingpositions I shall be using and I have coordinated this with >Klaus Wlotzka in order not to come too close to his openingpositions. > >My hardware is still this: > >Asus A8V Motherboard, Socket 939, FSB 1.000 MHz >AMD Athlon 64 4000+, 2.4 GHz, 1 MB Level 2 Cache, 90 nm San Diego Core >2 x 512 MB Corsair PC 3200XLPT RAM (CAS Latency 2-2-2-5) > >It's very possible that I am making a change concerning the GUI. I used to use >Shredder 9 GUI but for some reasons it's likely that I will use Hiarcs 10 GUI >from now on. However, I will only do this if the "analysed positions per second" >is acceptable and comparable to those of Shredder 9 GUI. In fact I am testing >this right now and it seems that the difference is very marginal for the >UCI-engines (1-2% slower in the Hiarcs 10 GUI). > >The time control will be either 5+5 or maybe 6+6. Ofcourse I will start posting >results here in this Forum and CSS-Forum when I am so far. > >Best regards >Per Hi Per, fine, looking forward to your tournament results and comparison with CSS list and ours. Have fun. Best Regards Heinz
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.