Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 10:37:52 01/18/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 18, 2006 at 13:34:29, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 18, 2006 at 13:24:17, Christopher Conkie wrote: > >>Hi Dan, >> >>It says this at the bottom...... >> >>0 of 40 matching moves >>1/18/2006 8:02:59 AM, Total time: 10:01:34 AM >>Rated time: 10:00:00 = 36000 Seconds >> >>Now I'm confused (which is not hard to do). Nowhere do I see the best moves for >>these positions. Could you explain this a little or have I missed the point? Not every EPD position has a bm or pm. In fact, I would say that the bm and pm are not known for certain, though there are probably only a few candidates. > >The target of the positions is to play games from them and not to find moves. No. That's Albert's target. I do not care what programs do from there. I want to see if the chess engine understands the position. >For some reason Dann Corbit chose to analyze them with rybka and I do not see >the benefit of it. It is plain to me. Does Rybka come up with a classical response? How about a novelty? I think that one hour and even 24 hour analysis may be fruitful. >If the target is to analyse opening positions then they are not more important >or less important than other opening positions. I do not think that analysis changes the importance of anything either.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.