Author: Dan Honeycutt
Date: 13:20:57 01/18/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 18, 2006 at 08:03:07, George Tsavdaris wrote: > I'm about to complete the learning of C and i have just started to read all of >these AB-search,Tranposition table,PVS,Negascout,SSS, etc.... > > I'm about to learn the PVS and MTD(f) right now and from what i read from CCC >all these years(without having that years too much concentration on what i was >reading about programming), i had the impression that almost all programs today >use PVS instead of MTD-f and that PVS is superior to MTD-f. BUT here: >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MTD-f and at the very end of the page it says: > >"Implementations of the MTD(f) algorithm had been proven to be better than other >search algorithms (e.g. Negascout) in games such as chess." > Hi George They go on to say: "However MTD(f) has practical issues in chess engines which makes it a less desirable choice. Today most chess enging authors still prefer Negascout". Now, if we could just figure out what a chess enging is. Best Dan H.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.