Author: enrico carrisco
Date: 14:13:49 01/18/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 18, 2006 at 15:58:31, James T. Walker wrote: >On January 18, 2006 at 12:21:00, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>On January 18, 2006 at 08:03:48, James T. Walker wrote: >> >>>On January 17, 2006 at 14:36:47, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >>> >>>>On January 17, 2006 at 14:29:48, James T. Walker wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 17, 2006 at 14:14:45, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>SSDF will Toga not test, CSS too. >>>>>> >>>>>>But other serious testers tests Toga II 1.1 ! >>>>>> >>>>>>Thank You! >>>>>> >>>>>>Here (Toga at time on place 2!): >>>>>> >>>>>>http://www.utzingerk.com/rating_list.htm >>>>>> >>>>>>And here: >>>>>> >>>>>>http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/cegtrating4040best.html >>>>>> >>>>>>Toga II 1.1 all in all very good place on Single processor! >>>>>> >>>>>>(German: Dual Resultate sollte man löschen da sie das Resultat verfälschen!) >>>>>> >>>>>>Congrats Thomas Gaksch! >>>>>> >>>>>>ED. >>>>> >>>>>Sorry but I don't trust "Ponder off" matches. >>>> >>>>Toga II 1.1 wins with Ponder = ON too! >>>> >>>>See here CSS Online Masters: >>>> >>>>http://f23.parsimony.net/forum50826/messages/140482.htm >>>> >>>>Gruppe A >>>>Platz Name Verein Pkte. W.1 1 2 3 >>>>4 5 6 7 8 >>>>1 Toga 1.1 HLanghans 7.5 41.00 x 0.5' 0.5 0.5' _ 1 _' >>>> 0.5' 0.5 0.5' 0.5 1 1' 1 _' >>>>2 Hiarcs10 Will./Cariss.85 6.0 35.75 0.5 0.5' x 0.5 0.5' 0' >>>>0.5 1 _' 0.5 1' 0.5' 0.5 0' _ >>>>3 Deep Fritz8 J.Hartmann 6.0 32.75 0.5 _' 0.5' 0.5 x 0.5' >>>>0.5 0.5 0' 1 0.5' 0' _ 1 0.5' >>>>4 DeepShredder9 ZorChamp 6.0 32.00 0' _ 1 0.5' 0.5 0.5' x >>>> 0 0.5' 0.5' _ 1 _' 0.5' 1 >>>>5 Ktulu 7.5 RSerfling 5.5 33.00 0.5 0.5' 0' _ 0.5' 1 1' >>>>0.5 x 0.5 _' 0 0.5' 0.5' _ >>>>6 Ruffian2 NWerner C2,8 5.5 31.50 0.5 0.5' 0.5' 0 0' 0.5 0.5 >>>>_' 0.5' _ x 0.5' 1 1 0' >>>>7 Smarthink ß WSchuele 5.5 29.00 0' 0 0.5 0.5' 1 _' 0' _ >>>> 1' 0.5 0.5 0' x 0.5' 1 >>>>8 Deep Junior 8 K.Richter, 4.0 23.00 0' _ 1 _' 0' 0.5 0.5 >>>>0' 0.5 _' 0' 1 0.5 0' x >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>In my opinion you are disabling >>>>>an important part of the engine which is used when the author "tunes" the >>>>>engine. >>>> >>>>>Just my opinion though. >>>> >>>>Luky, that is only Your opinion! :-) >>>> >>>>>Also backed up by the data in my database >>>>>which shows Toga II is weaker than Fruit. >>>> >>>>I say stronger as Fruit! >>>> >>>>OK ? >>> >>>You can say anything you want to. >> >>YES! >> >>But the Tournaments says what is real! I remember THUERINGEN 2005! >> >>TOGA won it! >> >> >>>That doesn't make it true. I have hundreds >>>of games by both programs and Toga is behind Fruit based on those games. That >>>is not opinion but fact. >> >>The Fact is that Fruit won not one Tournament, Toga does it!!! > >You're being silly. Tournaments mean very little for estimating relative >ratings. > > >> >>>>>Jim Do not argue with Nemethology -- it is based on feelings, intuitions, astrology and horoscopes. It has also been said that monkeys and darts play a role. Refuting it with a fact-based reasoning system is futile. -elc. :) :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.