Author: enrico carrisco
Date: 02:49:35 01/19/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 18, 2006 at 07:12:14, Michael Diosi wrote: >On January 18, 2006 at 04:34:07, CLiebert wrote: > >>On January 17, 2006 at 14:14:45, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >> >>>SSDF will Toga not test, CSS too. >>> >> >>Thats wrong - CSS did a test and published a rating month ago. Please read >>before making (not for the first time!) such false statements in public about >>css. >>Btw it is up to everybody himself to decide when he wants to start a test of a >>fruit-based-engine, sooner, later or may be never. >> >>It has nothing to do with serious or not, its just freedom to do what you want - >>to make such claims concerning ssdf und puting them under pressure is unfriendly >>imho. >>Me myselft I start testing gambitfruit, too, but I think it is far to early to >>see it as an "independent" engine. >> >>You will find toga and gf - ratings here: >> >>http://www.beepworld.de/members39/computerschach2/bff-liste.htm > > >Of course you may test what you want but in the same way everybody is free to >express its opinion about the CSS magazine, mine is that it is crap... > >MD Perhaps you'd like to expand on that... I thought we decided here a few weeks ago that saying something "sucked" or "is crap" was unacceptable unless there were reasonable explanations as to why someone had that feeling/viewpoint. -elc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.