Author: Vasik Rajlich
Date: 05:21:09 01/19/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 18, 2006 at 15:42:17, Dann Corbit wrote: >On January 18, 2006 at 10:20:43, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On January 18, 2006 at 07:21:27, Vasik Rajlich wrote: >> >>>On January 18, 2006 at 04:15:20, Majd Al-Ansari wrote: >>> >>>>Just wanted to know how the progress is going for the multiple processor version >>>>of Rybka. Also will it be sold as a seperate engine or part of the Rybka 1.2 >>>>options. >>>> >>>>Thanks >>> >>>Majd, >>> >>>multi-processor Rybka is a project for later in the year. It's also likely to be >>>a relatively low-end implementation, IMO search and evaluation intelligence are >>>more important. >>> >>>Vas >> >>You will keep the single-proccessor program updated with it? Or might you do as >>Fritz did, which was to make the multi-proc. updated and improved, and leave the >>single-proc., as a lower level, out of date engine? This forced many people with >>only a single-proc. computer to buy the dual engine, just to get something >>slightly stronger. It also costed about twice as much, and, it took about >>another year for Fritz to make the next single pro. This was a two-year gap. >>S.Taylor > >For sure, his approach is the right one: >1. Make it right. >2. Make it fast. > >The reverse order is always a mistake. Actually, it's more like this: 1) Code it fast 2) Make it right ... 8) Make it run fast :) Vas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.