Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 12:01:04 01/19/06
Hi, after a question below regarding the "superiority" of MTD(F) and the article on Wikipedia about that I decided to modify the entry and added a sentence in which I question the "superiority" of MTD(f) over PVS since it has "practical issues". Naturally some guys over in Wikipedia now want to see proof of my statement and want to know what kind of practical issues there really are. So I have two questions: 1.) Would you support the statement that MTD(F) is _not_ superior to PVS and while save in some circumstances a few % of nodes has "practical issues" which make it a less desirable choice? 2.) Could you (briefly) name some of the "practical issues"? regards Joachim P.S.: If someone feels encourage to reformulate the article on MTD(F) and Negascout (PVS) more knowledgeable please feel free to do so. ;-)
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.