Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Interesting position -- proof of superiority?

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 17:30:22 04/05/99

Go up one level in this thread

On April 04, 1999 at 11:34:36, Hans Havermann wrote:

>On April 03, 1999 at 18:47:48, I wrote:
>
>>               16   1327:46   0.45   1. Re1 fxg4 2. Rxe6 gxh3 3. Rg6 Ke8
>>                                    4. Qg8+ Bf8 5. Qe6+ Qe7 6. Bxd5 Nxd5
>>                                    7. Qxd5 Qe1+ 8. Kh2 Qxf2 9. Kxh3 Rc7
>>                                    10. Rg4 Rd7 11. Re4+ Kd8
>
>After some 30 billion nodes, here is MacChess' winning line for white (after
>1.Re1 fxg4) at the same depth:
>
> 2. Rxe6 gxh3
> 3. Rg6 Qxd4
> 4. Rxd6 h2+
> 5. Kh1 Qxf2
> 6. Bxh6 Qxb2
> 7. Bxg7+ Qxg7
> 8. Rf1+ Ke7
> 9. Qxg7+ Kxd6
>10. Qg6+ Kc5
>11. Kxh2
What is the centipawn eval at that point?

• Re: Interesting position -- proof of superiority? Hans Havermann 11:31:56 04/06/99
  • Re: Interesting position -- proof of superiority? Dann Corbit 14:02:11 04/06/99
  • Re: Interesting position -- proof of superiority? Dann Corbit 14:02:11 04/06/99
    • Re: Interesting position -- proof of superiority? Hans Havermann 19:34:15 04/06/99
      • Re: Interesting position -- proof of superiority? blass uri 20:53:07 04/06/99

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.