Author: enrico carrisco
Date: 16:01:36 01/19/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 19, 2006 at 08:43:31, Michael Diosi wrote: >On January 19, 2006 at 05:49:35, enrico carrisco wrote: > >>On January 18, 2006 at 07:12:14, Michael Diosi wrote: >> >>>On January 18, 2006 at 04:34:07, CLiebert wrote: >>> >>>>On January 17, 2006 at 14:14:45, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >>>> >>>>>SSDF will Toga not test, CSS too. >>>>> >>>> >>>>Thats wrong - CSS did a test and published a rating month ago. Please read >>>>before making (not for the first time!) such false statements in public about >>>>css. >>>>Btw it is up to everybody himself to decide when he wants to start a test of a >>>>fruit-based-engine, sooner, later or may be never. >>>> >>>>It has nothing to do with serious or not, its just freedom to do what you want - >>>>to make such claims concerning ssdf und puting them under pressure is unfriendly >>>>imho. >>>>Me myselft I start testing gambitfruit, too, but I think it is far to early to >>>>see it as an "independent" engine. >>>> >>>>You will find toga and gf - ratings here: >>>> >>>>http://www.beepworld.de/members39/computerschach2/bff-liste.htm >>> >>> >>>Of course you may test what you want but in the same way everybody is free to >>>express its opinion about the CSS magazine, mine is that it is crap... >>> >>>MD >> >>Perhaps you'd like to expand on that... I thought we decided here a few weeks >>ago that saying something "sucked" or "is crap" was unacceptable unless there >>were reasonable explanations as to why someone had that feeling/viewpoint. >> >>-elc. > >Complain to the moderators ! > >Michael I'm not complaining -- I'm simply asking you to elaborate on why you think the CSS Magazine "is crap..." Your diversion from that suggests that you have no concrete reasoning and you simply attacking Christian and other CSS folk. -elc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.