Author: Günther Simon
Date: 03:32:48 01/20/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 20, 2006 at 06:04:57, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On January 20, 2006 at 05:51:32, Martin Andersen2 wrote: > >>On January 20, 2006 at 05:28:47, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >> >> >>>I question that Rybka is already proven the strongest engine today. Then people >>>tell me to look at CEGT where that has been proven... This was a few days ago >>>here in CCC. I must object to such sort of hybris. The truth is that we dont >>>have statistical methods for making such claims. Even after 700 or maybe over >>>1000 games the significance is not so sure and if you look at the +/- boundaries >>>of the so called Elo results then you still have overlappings and you cant say >>>that Rybka is the clear first. >> >>Rybka 1.0 beta 64 bit 2859 +-21 >>Deep shredder 9 2CPU 2804 +-17 >> >>So Rybka's number 1 spot cannot be touched. You are wrong. >> >>Martin. > > >1 Rybka 1.01 Beta 9 64-bit opt 2921 73 68 71 80.3 % 2677 33.8 % >2 Rybka 1.0 Beta 64-bit 2859 21 21 765 68.4 % 2725 32.7 % >3 Deep Shredder 9.12 x64 2CPU 2844 45 45 168 64.6 % 2740 30.4 % Also apples and oranges... You show 1CPU vs. 2CPUs scroll a bit down to find an appropriate Shredder for real comparison ...snip babbling...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.