Author: Mridul Muralidharan
Date: 08:04:56 01/20/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 20, 2006 at 08:59:23, Tord Romstad wrote: >On January 20, 2006 at 07:19:05, Uri Blass wrote: > >>If your target is to improve glaurung's playing strength then it is possible >>that using ths same effort for improving the playing strength of it in a single >>processor is better as long as glaurung is significantly weaker than >>Rybka(single processor). > >My one and only target is having fun. Parallel search is one of many ways >to improve my program. Whether it is the easiest or the fastest road to >improvement doesn't matter at all. Being an amateur with no financial >motivations in computer chess, I have no need to compete with anybody. > >The only important thing is that implementing an efficient parallel search >looks like a very enjoyable and enlightening exercise. Of all the many >possible ways to continue the work on my program, it seems to be the most >interesting one at the moment. > >Tord Hear hear ! You speak for a lot of us Tord !! Mridul
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.