Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Sorry, Hiarcs 10 NOT Hiarcs 9!.

Author: Tomas Casanovas Martinez

Date: 11:13:18 01/21/06

Go up one level in this thread


On January 21, 2006 at 14:11:11, Tomas Casanovas Martinez wrote:

>Here you have my latest results with Rybka 1.01 Beta 11.
>
>Gauntlet
>Pentium IV Dual 3 Mhz.
>Gui Junior 9
>Book for all engines: Perfect 9
>Time control: 40/20min + 40/20min + 10min finish
>
>Rybka - Fritz 9      +0    -5    =3     18,75%     1,5/6,5
>Rybka - Hiarcs 10    +4    -1    =3     68,75%     5,5/2,5
>Rybka - Fruit 221    +4    -0    =4     75,00%     6,0/2,0
>
>I was a bit surprised by these results, because Rybka played excellent chess,
>including a couple of very good endgames against Hiarcs and Fruit, but was
>clearly beaten by Fritz.
>
>I decided to test against Rybka 1.01. Beta 11 against Fritz 9 to get more
>information, and the result was definitely AMAZING, although I know very well
>that these things can happen with a small number of games:
>
>Pentium IV Dual 3 Mhz.
>Gui Junior 9
>Book for Rybka= Perfect 9
>Book For Fritz 9= Fritz 9.
>Time control: 40/20min + 40/20min + 10min finish
>
>Rybka - Fritz 9     +8    -0    =2      90,00%     9,0/1,0
>
>Rybka played excellent chess, a big difference with the first part of this test
>where was beaten by Fritz 9. Only the book changed, not justifying at all the
>enormous difference in Rybka performance.
>
>Congratulations, Vas, for the impressive evolution of your Rybka.
>
>
>Overall results=    +16   -6    =12          22,0/12,0
>
>Probably influenced by the last test played, my feeling is that changes between
>Beta 10d and Beta 11 are bigger than between any other previous versions.
>
>Best regards,
>
>Tom Casanovas
>Barcelona - Spain.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.