Author: Tomas Casanovas Martinez
Date: 08:58:57 01/22/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 22, 2006 at 10:17:29, James T. Walker wrote: Probably you are right, Jim. Despite my 'personal bias' my biggest surprise was this 9-1 score for Rybka, anyway. ;-) Normally I apply the method you mentioned... but this time I felt free to made this decision, because I was testing a Beta version. Now I am testing again Rybka 1.01 Beta 11 against Hiarcs 10, Shredder 9 and Fritz 9. Thanks for your comment, Jim. Regards, Tom. >This looks like a clear case of personal Bias to me. :-) You didn't like the >result with Fritz so you did a repeat? You liked the other results so it was ok >to let it stand. To avoid biasing your results maybe you should pick an exact >number of games to play vs each and stick to it. The final overall result is >what counts. In short matches anything can happen. I've seen Rybka get beat by >Fritz 8 +8 -0 =2 for 9-1 score. But after 100 games Rybka won 67% of the games. >Regards, >Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.