Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 13:39:14 01/22/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 22, 2006 at 16:36:51, George Tsavdaris wrote: >On January 22, 2006 at 16:26:41, Andreas Guettinger wrote: > >>On January 22, 2006 at 16:12:31, George Tsavdaris wrote: >> >>>On January 22, 2006 at 16:01:25, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: >>> >>>>Does anybody have any evidence that the fritz gui may favour fritz under certain >>>>conditions? It is not created by a neautral party (chessbase), as was arena. >>> >>> Please before making any such statements you should consider giving some >>>evidence. Or else you may give some wrong impression about Fritz GUI that is >>>wrong..... Before a long time ago Ed Schrodder made a similar suggestion that i >>>don't remember if has been verified by others or proved correct.... >>> >> >>Which statement? I only see that he asked a question. >> > A question is a statement, and actually everything written are statements at >least in the way i interpret the word "statement". I may be wrong..... > > If i used the word "claim" then you would be right that i was wrong. And >actually in the way i used the word "statement" it seemingly means "claim", but >this wasn't my intention. > What i said is that asking that kind of questions without providing some >evidence (ALTHOUGH in a question you don't have to provide anything--it's just a >question!) some wrong impression might be occured.... but you were quite right. of course a claim has been made! and it was a statement. but then the writer also had asked a question. It is easy to be seen. He wrote two sentences and one was the claim the other was the question.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.