Author: Andreas Guettinger
Date: 13:43:38 01/22/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 22, 2006 at 16:36:51, George Tsavdaris wrote: >On January 22, 2006 at 16:26:41, Andreas Guettinger wrote: > >>On January 22, 2006 at 16:12:31, George Tsavdaris wrote: >> >>>On January 22, 2006 at 16:01:25, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: >>> >>>>Does anybody have any evidence that the fritz gui may favour fritz under certain >>>>conditions? It is not created by a neautral party (chessbase), as was arena. >>> >>> Please before making any such statements you should consider giving some >>>evidence. Or else you may give some wrong impression about Fritz GUI that is >>>wrong..... Before a long time ago Ed Schrodder made a similar suggestion that i >>>don't remember if has been verified by others or proved correct.... >>> >> >>Which statement? I only see that he asked a question. >> > A question is a statement, and actually everything written are statements at >least in the way i interpret the word "statement". I may be wrong..... > > If i used the word "claim" then you would be right that i was wrong. And >actually in the way i used the word "statement" it seemingly means "claim", but >this wasn't my intention. > What i said is that asking that kind of questions without providing some >evidence (ALTHOUGH in a question you don't have to provide anything--it's just a >question!) some wrong impression might be occured.... You make no sense to me. How can a questions that starts with: "Does anybody have any evidence..." be required to bring some evidence? That is the reason the question was asked. This might be different in english, but in german questions might have a meaning but usually don't make a statement. regards Andy
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.