Author: Andreas Guettinger
Date: 13:51:43 01/22/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 22, 2006 at 16:48:28, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On January 22, 2006 at 16:45:32, Andreas Guettinger wrote: > >>On January 22, 2006 at 16:31:33, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>On January 22, 2006 at 16:26:41, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >>> >>>>On January 22, 2006 at 16:12:31, George Tsavdaris wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 22, 2006 at 16:01:25, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Does anybody have any evidence that the fritz gui may favour fritz under certain >>>>>>conditions? It is not created by a neautral party (chessbase), as was arena. >>>>> >>>>> Please before making any such statements you should consider giving some >>>>>evidence. Or else you may give some wrong impression about Fritz GUI that is >>>>>wrong..... Before a long time ago Ed Schrodder made a similar suggestion that i >>>>>don't remember if has been verified by others or proved correct.... >>>>> >>>> >>>>Which statement? I only see that he asked a question. >>>> >>> >>>Statement that ChessBase gui was NOT made by neutral people like Arena. That is >>>really nonsense to say. Who is neutral in making a GUI? - Is this really coming >>>from chessplayers? Someone asks a question and makes a statement - and then >>>someone says where is the statement, it was a question. I mean... is this >>>possible? And this seems to be the style and logic that leads to most >>>misunderstandings here between members. >>> >>> >>> >>>>regards >>>>Andy >> >>I ignored the second part, because it's simply a fact. > >It's a fact of that sort that you could prove it in a courtcase? > A commercial company and competitor on the market is _never_ a neutral party. No evidence needed. > >> >>regards >>Andy
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.