Author: Andreas Guettinger
Date: 13:54:42 01/22/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 22, 2006 at 16:45:52, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On January 22, 2006 at 16:43:38, Andreas Guettinger wrote: > >>On January 22, 2006 at 16:36:51, George Tsavdaris wrote: >> >>>On January 22, 2006 at 16:26:41, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >>> >>>>On January 22, 2006 at 16:12:31, George Tsavdaris wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 22, 2006 at 16:01:25, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Does anybody have any evidence that the fritz gui may favour fritz under certain >>>>>>conditions? It is not created by a neautral party (chessbase), as was arena. >>>>> >>>>> Please before making any such statements you should consider giving some >>>>>evidence. Or else you may give some wrong impression about Fritz GUI that is >>>>>wrong..... Before a long time ago Ed Schrodder made a similar suggestion that i >>>>>don't remember if has been verified by others or proved correct.... >>>>> >>>> >>>>Which statement? I only see that he asked a question. >>>> >>> A question is a statement, and actually everything written are statements at >>>least in the way i interpret the word "statement". I may be wrong..... >>> >>> If i used the word "claim" then you would be right that i was wrong. And >>>actually in the way i used the word "statement" it seemingly means "claim", but >>>this wasn't my intention. >>> What i said is that asking that kind of questions without providing some >>>evidence (ALTHOUGH in a question you don't have to provide anything--it's just a >>>question!) some wrong impression might be occured.... >> >>You make no sense to me. How can a questions that starts with: "Does anybody >>have any evidence..." be required to bring some evidence? That is the reason the >>question was asked. >> >>This might be different in english, but in german questions might have a meaning >>but usually don't make a statement. >> > >So far so good. And now you will read the second sentence of the writer and you >will remark that he made a crystal clear claim which he couldnt prove. Can you >read that for me? you will see your mistake. > A commercial company on the market is by definition not a neutral party! And will never be for me, further discussion useless. > >>regards >>Andy
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.