Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 16:29:26 01/22/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 22, 2006 at 18:26:40, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >On January 22, 2006 at 17:22:11, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On January 22, 2006 at 16:51:43, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >> >>>On January 22, 2006 at 16:48:28, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>> >>>>On January 22, 2006 at 16:45:32, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 22, 2006 at 16:31:33, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On January 22, 2006 at 16:26:41, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On January 22, 2006 at 16:12:31, George Tsavdaris wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On January 22, 2006 at 16:01:25, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Does anybody have any evidence that the fritz gui may favour fritz under certain >>>>>>>>>conditions? It is not created by a neautral party (chessbase), as was arena. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please before making any such statements you should consider giving some >>>>>>>>evidence. Or else you may give some wrong impression about Fritz GUI that is >>>>>>>>wrong..... Before a long time ago Ed Schrodder made a similar suggestion that i >>>>>>>>don't remember if has been verified by others or proved correct.... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Which statement? I only see that he asked a question. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Statement that ChessBase gui was NOT made by neutral people like Arena. That is >>>>>>really nonsense to say. Who is neutral in making a GUI? - Is this really coming >>>>>>from chessplayers? Someone asks a question and makes a statement - and then >>>>>>someone says where is the statement, it was a question. I mean... is this >>>>>>possible? And this seems to be the style and logic that leads to most >>>>>>misunderstandings here between members. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>regards >>>>>>>Andy >>>>> >>>>>I ignored the second part, because it's simply a fact. >>>> >>>>It's a fact of that sort that you could prove it in a courtcase? >>>> >>> >>>A commercial company and competitor on the market is _never_ a neutral party. No >>>evidence needed. >> >>I see - mmh, and you conclude that these people cant do things properly in a >>GUI? But Arena people can do that properly - is it this what you could prove? Or >>are you realising that you cant prove that? > >No. You got my motivations wrong. I neither have Chessbase nor Arena, nor do I >claim one is better than the other. >I just found Joseph had a valid questions, and was attacked without reasons like >it always happens when somebody askes sth that might throw the doubt of a shadow >on chessbase. That is funny because we are just discussing if you could prove what Joseph claimed and what you seemed to believe. It is strange that you dont get it that the allegation, the prejudice is told and then if asked for evidence people like you react as if they were accused of somethng not kosher. The truth is they themselves have claimed something not kosher. This is getting ridiculous. Again: did you personally EVER see any evidence for your claim that ChessBase did something to the GUI that disabled non-ChessBase engines? I mean proof that you could bring into a court case? I doubt you or anybody else has such a proof. And therefore everything is exaggerated and bad defaming. I could ask the contrary question: is Arena distributing the resources absolutely fair? Could someone prove that? For sure? - You see where we end if we begin to ask such questions? It ends in possible lawsuits and the you had to prove your oh so innocent questions and claims... Bye for now. > >Good night >Andy > > >> >> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>regards >>>>>Andy
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.