Author: Andreas Guettinger
Date: 04:05:15 01/23/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 22, 2006 at 19:29:26, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On January 22, 2006 at 18:26:40, Andreas Guettinger wrote: > >>On January 22, 2006 at 17:22:11, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>On January 22, 2006 at 16:51:43, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >>> >>>>On January 22, 2006 at 16:48:28, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 22, 2006 at 16:45:32, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On January 22, 2006 at 16:31:33, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On January 22, 2006 at 16:26:41, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On January 22, 2006 at 16:12:31, George Tsavdaris wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On January 22, 2006 at 16:01:25, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Does anybody have any evidence that the fritz gui may favour fritz under certain >>>>>>>>>>conditions? It is not created by a neautral party (chessbase), as was arena. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please before making any such statements you should consider giving some >>>>>>>>>evidence. Or else you may give some wrong impression about Fritz GUI that is >>>>>>>>>wrong..... Before a long time ago Ed Schrodder made a similar suggestion that i >>>>>>>>>don't remember if has been verified by others or proved correct.... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Which statement? I only see that he asked a question. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Statement that ChessBase gui was NOT made by neutral people like Arena. That is >>>>>>>really nonsense to say. Who is neutral in making a GUI? - Is this really coming >>>>>>>from chessplayers? Someone asks a question and makes a statement - and then >>>>>>>someone says where is the statement, it was a question. I mean... is this >>>>>>>possible? And this seems to be the style and logic that leads to most >>>>>>>misunderstandings here between members. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>regards >>>>>>>>Andy >>>>>> >>>>>>I ignored the second part, because it's simply a fact. >>>>> >>>>>It's a fact of that sort that you could prove it in a courtcase? >>>>> >>>> >>>>A commercial company and competitor on the market is _never_ a neutral party. No >>>>evidence needed. >>> >>>I see - mmh, and you conclude that these people cant do things properly in a >>>GUI? But Arena people can do that properly - is it this what you could prove? Or >>>are you realising that you cant prove that? >> >>No. You got my motivations wrong. I neither have Chessbase nor Arena, nor do I >>claim one is better than the other. >>I just found Joseph had a valid questions, and was attacked without reasons like >>it always happens when somebody askes sth that might throw the doubt of a shadow >>on chessbase. > >That is funny because we are just discussing if you could prove what Joseph >claimed and what you seemed to believe. ROTFL. Last time: There was no claim from Joseph nor from me that need any proof. We are not on a court here. Please stop to frigthen users that have valid questions on this forum. What a waste of time - Andy It is strange that you dont get it that >the allegation, the prejudice is told and then if asked for evidence people like >you react as if they were accused of somethng not kosher. The truth is they >themselves have claimed something not kosher. This is getting ridiculous. Again: >did you personally EVER see any evidence for your claim that ChessBase did >something to the GUI that disabled non-ChessBase engines? I mean proof that you >could bring into a court case? I doubt you or anybody else has such a proof. And >therefore everything is exaggerated and bad defaming. >I could ask the contrary question: is Arena distributing the resources >absolutely fair? Could someone prove that? For sure? - You see where we end if >we begin to ask such questions? It ends in possible lawsuits and the you had to >prove your oh so innocent questions and claims... > >Bye for now. > > >> >>Good night >>Andy >> >> >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>regards >>>>>>Andy
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.