Author: Albert Silver
Date: 07:11:16 01/23/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 23, 2006 at 09:37:55, James T. Walker wrote:
>Here are the results of all my Rybka blitz testing. I ran Rybka in 2 different
>GUIs. In the Shredder 9UCI GUI I used Shredder 9 book for Rybka. In the Fritz
>GUI I used Fritz8.ctg for Rybka. All games are with 1 cpu each and ponder on
>with a small exception where I ran some auto232 games with Rybka on an XP2400+
>and Shredder 8(2cpu) on the AMD64x2-3800+.
>
>1 Rybka 1.01 Beta 11b 32-bit 2442 158
>2 Rybka 1.01 Beta 10d 32 bit 2420 464
>3 Rybka 1.01 Beta 11 32-bit 2420 404
>4 Rybka 1.01 Beta 9 32-bit 2385 198
>5 Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit 2383 537
>6 Rybka 1.01 Preview 2 32-bit 2373 360
>7 Rybka 1.01 Beta 7fast 2368 194
>8 Rybka 1.01 Beta 9 Opt 2363 246
>9 Rybka 1.01 Beta 7 32-bit 2352 390
>10 Rybka 1.01 Beta 7slow 2348 160
>11 Shredder 8(2) 2346 80
>12 Fruit 2.2.1 2330 732
>13 Shredder 9 UCI 2322 222
>14 Toga II 1.1 2315 952
>15 Fritz 8 2314 907
>16 Junior 9 2284 120
>17 Hiarcs 9 2270 50
>18 CT2004 2264 48
Is the second number the number of games played? What are the time controls? Do
you have the sepaarte results of Rybka using the Shredder book, and those of it
using the Fritz book? Sandro said that Rybka was especially well-suited for the
Shredder book, thus it should score better, so comparative results would be
interesting. What is the Fast and Slow setting? Finally, wouldn't Rybka be even
more at a disadvanatge against Shredder 8(2) using the 2400XP+, or have you
tested it to be equivalent to one core of the X2?
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.