Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 10:40:49 01/23/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 23, 2006 at 04:05:56, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >Why 47 games (Junior 7 played one game more with white pieces!) ? > >My last german Statement about SSDF read here: > >http://f27.parsimony.net/forum67838/messages/1411.htm > >ED. Automated translation of E. N.'s post: Computer chess results table "SSDF" once again in my criticism! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- . • LIFELINE • -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- . Written of Eduard Nemeth on the 23 January 2006 09:28:09: Computer chess results table "SSDF" once again in my criticism! For the last time, before I the subject of computer end would conclude the month chess here in the forum. Already in following messages of this forum, enough stands doubt, around to have this list: http://f27.parsimony.net/forum67838/messages/1380.htm How ungründlich of the SSDF rides away, that following should show parties and messages once again. In following messages (only with password readably), we see two things: 1st Fritz 9 plays here parties against its namesakes altogether 46. As a rule however the programs duel themselves in the SSDF usually only with 40 parties. Now well, we want to be gracious, make the one Tester of the SSDF it so, the other differently. Nevertheless I find covered it something that the Tester does not shun itself here to expect two Fritzprogrammen 46 parties against each other. Are yes, there then not also other programs yet for Fritz 9.0.0.0? :) 2nd Fritz 5.32 played here 200 MHz MMX-computers on an age old P. Was this computer however interest about 10 years ago current, whom therefore these 46 parties? My already aged P3 600 MHz will have soon 6 years on the humpback and is in the reason actual already scrap! Around how much more then an age old P 200 MHz? Here the result covered in my eyes totally (what the amount of the parties concerns) and the messages (password required) : http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?481247 SSDF Fritz 5.32 MMX - Fritz 9.0 A1200 Ended: 6-40 In the following messages (password required) will see the end-result a Matches. We see that altogether 47 parties were played. That however is an odd number according to what a program must have played a party more with the white stones! That however is not is large seriously there white always a conscience suit advantage has, also if it in computers less as with persons. I went through all parties. Fruit began knows the first party with, therefore in the odd number sequence. J7 began in the straight number sequence. Everything ran correctly to the party 36. However in the party 37 had knows sees junior 7 once again like one here below. Junior 7 a party had played at the end therefore more with the white stones than a Fruit 2.2.1. that however is unkorrekt and in my eyes of a serious Testers unworthy (only my opinion)! Here the messages out of the CCC forum (password required) as well as the ungereimten two parties: http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?481382 SSDF Fruit 2.2.1 A1200 - junior 7.0 A1200 Ended: 38.5-8.5 http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?481356 On my homepages under "chess-moments", already explained reads amazes me I with the Testerei of the SSDF, and who that there that after that nothing more in the SSDF! Homepage of Eduard Nemeth
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.