Author: blass uri
Date: 12:10:31 04/06/99
Go up one level in this thread
On April 05, 1999 at 21:29:36, Dann Corbit wrote: >On April 02, 1999 at 13:02:38, blass uri wrote: >[snip] >>>My question, "Does anyone have a centipawn evaluation that reflects a winning >>>advantage?" >> >>Junior5.3 showed after 25 minutes Re1 fxg4 Rxe6 gxh3 Rg6 >> >>It did not show a winning advantage but after following this line I found a >>winning advantage for white. >> >>I gave Junior5.3 the position after Re1 fxg4 Rxe6. >> >>gxh3 is a mistake and Junior5.3 after some hours prefered Rc6 for black with >>only 1.0x pawn advantage for white (I do not remember x) >With that much wood on the board, I would hestitate to call a one pawn advantage >winning, but that is certainly by far the most decisive evaluation I have seen >thus far. I agree that 1 pawn is not a winning advantage and I meant that white has a winning advantage after Rxg6 fxg4 Rxe6 gxh3? I did not investigate the position after Rxg6 fxg4 Rxe6 Rc6 and I am based on the evaluation of Junior when it found Rc6 after some hours. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.