Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 18:34:48 01/24/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 24, 2006 at 21:29:16, Dann Corbit wrote: >On January 23, 2006 at 22:09:44, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>The first Rybka Beta EXE has about 2,5 MB. >>Rybka Beta 12 EXE have now about 4 MB! >> >>(I remember: Fritz 6 GUI-EXE has about 3 MB) >> >>Why this? Much more knowledge now implementing? >> >>I cannot see it. No EGTB at time and no endgame knowledge. > >From the Rybka documentation: > >"What can we expect from Beta 13, and when can we expect it? > >Beta 13 should have the following features: > >1) EGTB access >2) Bug fixes > >It should be ready within 3 days. > >What about the actual endgame knowledge? > >This is being worked on in parallel and is going through an offline process. It >looks to be roughly on schedule for integration into a released version of Rybka >sometime around Feb 1." > > >>How big will be the final Rybka 1.2? > >Here is a terabyte disk for $700: >http://stores.channeladvisor.com/brand-new-electronics/items/item.aspx?itemid=4136909 > >That means that 14,285,714 bytes of space is one penny's worth. > >>Testposition (the position is draw): >> >>[D]8/8/2pK1k2/p4P2/P7/8/8/8 w - - 0 1 >> >>Analysis by Rybka 1.01 Beta 12 32-bit: >> >>6.Kxc6 Kxf5 7.Kb5 Ke6 8.Kxa5 Kd7 9.Kb6 Kc8 10.Ka7 Kc7 11.Ka6 Kb8 12.Kb5 Ka7 >> +- (1.61) Tiefe: 43 00:02:18 18953kN >>6.Kxc6 Kxf5 7.Kb5 Ke6 8.Kxa5 Kd7 9.Kb6 Kc8 10.Ka7 Kc7 11.Ka6 Kb8 12.Kb5 Ka7 >> +- (1.61) Tiefe: 44 00:03:05 30131kN >>6.Kxc6 Kxf5 7.Kb5 Ke6 8.Kxa5 Kd7 9.Kb6 Kc8 10.Ka7 Kc7 11.Ka6 Kb8 12.Kb5 Ka7 >> +- (1.61) Tiefe: 45 00:04:46 63438kN >> >>(Nemeth, Privat 24.01.2006) > >Trivial with tablebase files, which are coming. > >>BTW: I need see a small engine with more knowledge and not a big engine with >>little knowledge. > >Since it is probably the strongest single CPU engine in the world, it must not >be too idiotic. > >If you want "strong + ultra-tiny" try Thinker: >http://www.geocities.com/thechessthinker/index.html > The Old Siberian CHess wasnt bad either. But honestly isnt that a contradictio in prosecco if you say strong _and_ ultra-tiny? Sounds as if you meant a peabrain? How could it be strong? > > >>ED.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.