Author: Günther Simon
Date: 03:18:38 01/25/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 25, 2006 at 06:03:02, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>On January 25, 2006 at 03:59:29, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>
>>On January 25, 2006 at 03:53:36, allan johnson wrote:
>>
>>>On January 24, 2006 at 20:01:20, robert flesher wrote:
>>>
>>>>Here are the first 21 games after I reset the match, enjoy.
>>>Robert: I am interested in checking out some of the games and appreciate you
>>>posting them. Unfortunately I find the text difficult and awkward to read.Is it
>>>possible to post the games with just the moves?
>>>Al
>>
>>looks as if the PGN has syphilis.
>>
>>
>>EMT here, EMT there.
>>what a crap.
>
>
>Perhaps this can help against your ill-minded prejudice. What you called
>syphilis, is in truth the added exact time used for each move in a match, and
>with the proper software you can watch the time instantly in a different color -
>that is the main reason for this sort of coding. If I were a tester of chess
>software, in special if I would test with ChessBase products, and especially if
>I were a strict critic of all what came from ChessBaase, I would like to know
>with extreme urgence exactly what was played by the examined program and in what
>time. The exact time record is also very important if we want to check the
>authenticity of test games.
That's all wrong, the old format also notes the timestamps of course
and the GUI can do all the same things with it.
[Eg. ->new: 59. Rd4 {[%eval 111,10] [%emt 0:00:06]} == ->old: 59. Rd4 (+1.11/15
6)]
However it is not CBs fault (this time;), because the _user_ has to
set up in the options, which output he prefers.
Guenther
>The moves alone cant prove it but with the exact
>time a later analysis reveils the truth. Of course all this seems to be of no
>value for you because you want to insinuate that a couple of tunings from your
>side could make any engine better by large margins. But in truth this isnt
>"proven" at all. In truth you must have known since long that if you want to
>prove the superiority of your tunings, you must care of the comparability of the
>different factors. Otherwise even seemingly correct differences have no value at
>all. But do you really like to do all that work if you know that the results
>have no value out of principal reasons?? I wouldnt think so.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.