Author: Joseph Ciarrochi
Date: 23:49:45 01/25/06
Go up one level in this thread
I too would like to see such postings. I have been having some trouble
demonstrating improvement at the 40/4 time control, though I need another week
of constant testing to really make any conclusions. I'd like to know if it has
improved too, especially at longer time controls?
here are the preliminary tournment results using noomen test set.
Round 84
rybka beta 12 default 55.5 (but 6-11 against fritz9)
frita 9 54
fruit 2.2.1 44.5 (main difference between f9 and fruit is fruit does
poorly against rybka)
toga II.1 36
spike 1.0a 33
ruffian 2.1 29
so the engines are ranked is in the order you would expect, but rybka 9 isn't
that much better than fritz9 yet. I am sure bigger differences will emerge over
time, but will it be better than 48 point advantage rybka beta 1 already had
over fritz 9? (http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/eloblitzall.html). I don't know.
best
Joseph
On January 26, 2006 at 01:59:48, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>Has anybody ever seen better overall scores with the many
>Rybka beta's compared with the first Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit.
>[http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/cegtrating4040best.html#4]
>[http://www.utzingerk.com/rybka10beta_test.htm]
>I can't remember and am therefore asking if we can indeed
>speak of any progress (apart from reducing number of bugs).
>It would be a pleasure to see a list with some hundred games
>vs other engines (no dummy bullet 1m+1s and 3m+0s games)
>proving the contrary of my assumption.
>Best regards
>Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.