Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 23:57:56 01/25/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 25, 2006 at 18:24:13, enrico carrisco wrote: >On January 25, 2006 at 16:34:10, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>On January 25, 2006 at 16:12:47, Albert Silver wrote: >> >>>On January 25, 2006 at 15:50:23, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >>> >>>>Rybka 1.01 Beta 12 loses. >>>> >>>>Nunn1 Match 1'+1", Rybka 1.01 Beta 12 vs Toga II 1.1 UCI 8,5-11,5 ! >>> >>>I don't want to look like I am dismissing your results, but 1+1, and only 20 >>>games? >> >>Hi! >> >>Nunn1 Test have 10 Positions (more tactical in my opinion) and also 20 games! >> >>And: Toga II 1.1 won. That's all! >> >>ED. > >You have stated many times that you do not recognize "blitz" results and you've >even scoffed at the CEGT 40/4 and CSS Rating Lists saying that because of their >shorter time controls, they aren't "serious rating lists." > >So if 40/4 isn't a serious control -- what's 1+1? You are right! My matches with 1+1 was only a experiment, then I seen here in the Forum any people who played 100 -->1000 (!) games on this timecontrol. Such games are real a Joke! A Joke is for me by CEGT the 40/4 too! For my experiment I used the first NUNN Testset (Nunn1.cbh) and Rybka loses against Toga on my PC. I have wonder me first but the games was played real in this line how I post the games! You see here: On Blitz Timecontrols 60/40, 40/4 or 1+1 is all possible, that Rybka loses too! ED. > >Perhaps your preferences are selective based on which engine you decide to >attack at that moment. > >-elc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.