Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 00:16:07 01/26/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2006 at 03:05:10, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>On January 25, 2006 at 16:57:32, Chessfun wrote:
>
>>On January 25, 2006 at 16:34:10, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>>
>>>On January 25, 2006 at 16:12:47, Albert Silver wrote:
>>>
>>>>On January 25, 2006 at 15:50:23, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Rybka 1.01 Beta 12 loses.
>>>>>
>>>>>Nunn1 Match 1'+1", Rybka 1.01 Beta 12 vs Toga II 1.1 UCI 8,5-11,5 !
>>>>
>>>>I don't want to look like I am dismissing your results, but 1+1, and only 20
>>>>games?
>>>
>>>Hi!
>>>
>>>Nunn1 Test have 10 Positions (more tactical in my opinion) and also 20 games!
>>>
>>>And: Toga II 1.1 won. That's all!
>>>
>>>ED.
>>
>>Hi Eduard.
>>
>>Why did you use 1.1 not 1.1a? Do you agree these are the same engines from the
>>point of eng v eng matches?
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>Sarah
>
>Hello Sarah!
>
>Nice to see You.
>
>1. I used Toga II 1.1 then i feel (only my feeling) that the version 1.1 is a
>little faster in games than 1.1a, but I can be wrong.
>
>2. I seen on CSS Online Masters that L. Bauer used too Toga II 1.1 and not Toga
>II 1.1a and he wins.
>
>(the Version Toga II 1.1a is for the MV mode only important)
>
>My Best,
>Eduard.
Sarah, You see here that L. Bauer (account "Comchess) played with Toga II 1.1
againsr Fritz 9:
[Event "Freundschaftspartie,60m+15s"]
[Site "CSS Online Masters 2006"]
[Date "2006.01.23"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Comchess, Toga II 1.1"]
[Black "Katzenmaier, Fritz 9"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B17"]
[PlyCount "128"]
[EventDate "2006.01.23"]
[TimeControl "3600+15"]
1. d4 {0} c6 {0} 2. e4 {0} d5 {0} 3. Nc3 {0} dxe4 {0} 4. Nxe4 {0} Nd7 {0} 5.
Bc4 {(Sg5) 0} Ngf6 {0} 6. Ng5 {0} e6 {0} 7. Qe2 {0} Nb6 {0} 8. Bd3 {(Lb3) 0} h6
{0} 9. N5f3 {0} c5 {0} 10. dxc5 {0} Bxc5 {0} 11. Ne5 {0} Nbd7 {0} 12. Ngf3 {0}
Nxe5 {0} 13. Nxe5 {0} O-O {0} 14. O-O {(Ld2) 0} b6 {0} 15. Bf4 {(b4) 0} Bb7 {0}
16. Rad1 {0} Qc7 {0} 17. Bg3 {0.30/15 261} Bd6 {0} 18. Nd7 {0.41/17 186} Qxd7 {
0} 19. Bxd6 {0.51/18 211} Rfd8 {0.88/16 101} 20. Be5 {0.40/17 105} Qe7 {
0.84/15 90} 21. Rfe1 {(f4) 0.43/15 116} Rac8 {0.75/15 263} 22. c3 {0.56/16 391}
Nd7 {0.71/17 0} 23. Bd6 {0.72/15 98} Qf6 {0.81/15 86} 24. Qg4 {0.71/16 86} Nc5
{0.90/15 70} 25. Bc2 {0.92/15 85} Qg5 {0.89/15 38} 26. Qxg5 {0.94/17 51} hxg5 {
0.87/15 74} 27. f3 {(h3) 0.85/17 57} Bc6 {0.85/16 352} 28. Be7 {0.94/18 87}
Rxd1 {0.98/16 229} 29. Rxd1 {0.92/20 0} Bd5 {0.98/15 166} 30. Bxg5 {1.27/19 140
} Bxa2 {1.06/16 3} 31. Ra1 {1.17/20 76} Bb3 {1.05/17 24} 32. Bxb3 {1.20/21 120}
Nxb3 {1.10/17 24} 33. Rxa7 {1.32/21 114} Nc5 {1.03/16 0} 34. Kf1 {
(Ta2) 1.29/20 93} Nd3 {0.93/17 178} 35. Ra2 {1.16/21 0} Rc5 {0.78/16 120} 36.
h4 {(Le3) 1.27/21 0} Re5 {0.62/16 88} 37. Bd2 {1.37/21 86} Ra5 {0.65/17 39} 38.
Rxa5 {1.73/23 44} bxa5 {1.05/19 73} 39. b3 {(c4) 1.77/23 11} Nc5 {0.46/18 135}
40. b4 {1.92/24 0} Nb3 {1.34/17 90} 41. Ke2 {1.93/22 125} a4 {1.83/17 34} 42.
Kd1 {(c4) 2.31/21 35} e5 {2.05/17 225} 43. Kc2 {2.59/23 84} f5 {2.29/16 0} 44.
b5 {2.31/22 131} Kf7 {2.03/17 0} 45. b6 {2.38/22 91} Nc5 {2.59/18 28} 46. Kb2 {
(c4) 2.42/21 54} Ke6 {2.24/17 83} 47. Be3 {2.69/22 0} Nb7 {2.32/18 111} 48. Ka3
{3.08/24 0} Kd5 {2.79/18 79} 49. Kb4 {(Kxa4) 3.08/23 0} Kc6 {2.59/18 86} 50.
Kxa4 {3.33/23 67} f4 {3.12/18 18} 51. Bf2 {(Lg1) 3.45/25 71} g6 {3.33/21 76}
52. c4 {3.44/27 0} Nd6 {3.55/21 155} 53. c5 {3.44/25 0} Nb7 {3.27/21 157} 54.
Kb4 {3.44/25 53} Nd8 {4.11/22 41} 55. Kc3 {(Ka5) 3.44/23 21} Nb7 {4.24/21 82}
56. Bg1 {3.44/24 63} Nd8 {3.42/21 0} 57. Kb3 {(Kb4) 3.45/25 52} Kb5 {3.14/21 53
} 58. Kc2 {(Lf2) 3.45/26 79} Kc4 {3.44/21 60} 59. c6 {4.66/24 86} Nxc6 {
3.93/21 0} 60. b7 {5.48/23 51} Kd5 {4.30/19 70} 61. Ba7 {(Lb6) 5.48/23 13} Nb4+
{5.15/18 44} 62. Kd2 {6.79/23 53} Nc6 {5.79/19 0} 63. b8=Q {6.95/23 77} Nxb8 {
6.48/20 0} 64. Bxb8 {8.47/21 18} Ke6 {
Katzenmaier,Fritz 9 gibt auf (Lag: Av=0.25s, max=0.7s) 7.48/20 31} 1-0
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.