Author: Keith Hyams
Date: 02:55:53 01/26/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2006 at 05:24:47, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote:
>keith, this does sound promising. Also, i agree that bullet may reflect true
>strength, so long as their are not alot of time forfits and the such.
>
>The only time where might not correlate as strongly with long games is if their
>is if its search strength only comes in at longer times (I had a discussion on
>this list with Dan on this point, and he suggested their could be important
>differences here). However, if their is a disconnect between bullet ranking and
>longer ranking, it would be very interesting to see.
>
>
>
>Can you give us a sense of the results of beta 1 versus beta 12 in your bullet
>games? I hope you are right about its improvement
A Cozzie also commented that Zappa search depth takes time to get going. However
Kurt's comments were referring to Rybka and if Rybka tells me that in my bullet
games it is searching and evaluating to depth 9 I will bear in mind that most
other engines tell me the same and therefore believe it.
Vas asked me to carry out tests on betas 10d 11 and 11b and,having done that,out
of curiosity, I played 166 bullets between 11b and the original release. I got
+56=71-39. Of course I should have played more but at the time it did enough to
satisfy my personal curiosity.
Regards
Keith
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.