Author: Chessfun
Date: 04:03:46 01/26/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2006 at 03:05:10, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >On January 25, 2006 at 16:57:32, Chessfun wrote: > >>On January 25, 2006 at 16:34:10, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >> >>>On January 25, 2006 at 16:12:47, Albert Silver wrote: >>> >>>>On January 25, 2006 at 15:50:23, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >>>> >>>>>Rybka 1.01 Beta 12 loses. >>>>> >>>>>Nunn1 Match 1'+1", Rybka 1.01 Beta 12 vs Toga II 1.1 UCI 8,5-11,5 ! >>>> >>>>I don't want to look like I am dismissing your results, but 1+1, and only 20 >>>>games? >>> >>>Hi! >>> >>>Nunn1 Test have 10 Positions (more tactical in my opinion) and also 20 games! >>> >>>And: Toga II 1.1 won. That's all! >>> >>>ED. >> >>Hi Eduard. >> >>Why did you use 1.1 not 1.1a? Do you agree these are the same engines from the >>point of eng v eng matches? >> >>Thanks >> >>Sarah > >Hello Sarah! > >Nice to see You. > >1. I used Toga II 1.1 then i feel (only my feeling) that the version 1.1 is a >little faster in games than 1.1a, but I can be wrong. > >2. I seen on CSS Online Masters that L. Bauer used too Toga II 1.1 and not Toga >II 1.1a and he wins. > >(the Version Toga II 1.1a is for the MV mode only important) > >My Best, >Eduard. Eduard, Reason I asked is in CCRL testing although Toga II 1.1a did ok 6th place but its performance against Hiarcs 10 9th place is going to be a really bad loss currently its at +1 -8 =8 Sarah
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.