Author: enrico carrisco
Date: 04:12:40 01/26/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2006 at 05:55:53, Keith Hyams wrote: >On January 26, 2006 at 05:24:47, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: > >>keith, this does sound promising. Also, i agree that bullet may reflect true >>strength, so long as their are not alot of time forfits and the such. >> >>The only time where might not correlate as strongly with long games is if their >>is if its search strength only comes in at longer times (I had a discussion on >>this list with Dan on this point, and he suggested their could be important >>differences here). However, if their is a disconnect between bullet ranking and >>longer ranking, it would be very interesting to see. >> >> >> >>Can you give us a sense of the results of beta 1 versus beta 12 in your bullet >>games? I hope you are right about its improvement > >A Cozzie also commented that Zappa search depth takes time to get going. However >Kurt's comments were referring to Rybka and if Rybka tells me that in my bullet >games it is searching and evaluating to depth 9 I will bear in mind that most >other engines tell me the same and therefore believe it. > >Vas asked me to carry out tests on betas 10d 11 and 11b and,having done that,out >of curiosity, I played 166 bullets between 11b and the original release. I got >+56=71-39. Of course I should have played more but at the time it did enough to >satisfy my personal curiosity. > Regards > Keith Did you know that if you throw a handful of 166 pennies up in the air, they will land in a completely unique disbursement each time you conduct the experiment? -elc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.