Author: Günther Simon
Date: 05:43:36 01/26/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2006 at 08:29:41, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >This is a new question IMO. How much testing must be done before you can assume >that the factor chess doesnt play a decisive role regarding the results? Test >positions were mentioned. Nunn opening lines. When could we make conclusions >that now it's time to publish a realy true ranking of quality for chess engines? >Just to clarify, I dont mean "normal" probability changes and boundaries. The chess factor (strength in playing chess)is exactly what should be measured, thus I don't understand what you mean by gettin' rid off that? Can you explain better what you liked to question? (The last two sentences even don't make any sense in English?) Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.