Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 07:05:51 01/26/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2006 at 10:00:09, Thomas Lagershausen wrote:
>On January 26, 2006 at 09:47:56, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>> Hi Thomas
>> No doubt, Rybka is state of the art in computerchess.
>> But this is/was not my question which can't not be
>> answered by only comparing some single positions. I want
>> to see a comparison between Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit
>> and Rybka X Beta 32-bit under same conditions on the
>> basis of some hundered games vs many engines. I am
>> still waiting ... but am almost sure that nobody will
>> be able to present such a list at reasonable time control.
>> Best regards
>> Kurt
>
>Hi,Kurt
>
>i didn´t know lots of people which are soo hardworking on matchtesting like you.
>So it looks like you have to do it by yourself.
>
>Best regards
>Thomas
Hi Thomas
This may be the point -:) But frankly spoken, I have not
yet bought Rybka as I do deeply dislike downloading every
four days a new version not allowing me serious tests and
furthermore I very much dislike to become a member of
Yahoo group just for the purpose of getting latest information
and access to download possibilities.
Best regards
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.