Author: Günther Simon
Date: 12:31:03 01/26/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2006 at 13:59:45, Albert Silver wrote: >On January 26, 2006 at 13:54:32, chandler yergin wrote: > >>Well it's WRONG! >>New game, >>[D]B2k4/KPpP4/n1Pb4/P5p1/5p2/5P2/8/8 b - - 0 1 >> >>Analysis by Shredder 8: >> >>1. -+ (-1.81): 1...Nb8 2.Kxb8 Bc5 3.a6 g4 4.a7 Bd6 5.fxg4 >>2. +- (#8): 1...Ke7 2.Kxa6 Kf6 3.d8Q+ Be7 4.Qh8+ Ke6 5.b8Q Bf6 6.Qb3+ Ke5 7.Qb2+ >>Kd5 8.Qhxf6 g4 9.Qbd4# >>3. +- (#7): 1...Bf8 2.Kxa6 Ke7 3.b8Q Kf7 4.d8Q Be7 5.Qg8+ Kf6 6.Qbb3 >>4. +- (#7): 1...Bc5+ 2.Kxa6 Ke7 3.b8Q Kf6 4.d8Q+ Be7 5.Qh8+ Kf5 6.Qbc8+ Kg6 >>7.Qhg8+ Kh5 8.Qh3# >> >>(, 26.01.2006) > >I'm a bit confused. You didn't even show Shredder finding the mate after Nb8. >You only showed it was capable of finding the mate if Black played a weaker move >than Nb8. How long does it take to see the mate after Black plays the more >resilient Nb8? > > Albert For the same analysis in this thread he says once 'VERY IMPRESSIVE! GOOD PROGRAM!'(TheKing) and the next time 'Well it's WRONG!' ;-) (AnMon) And after this contradictory answers he presents a completely irrelevant Shredder multi variation analysis which only gives an advantage for Black... Well what should we think about this? Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.