Author: chandler yergin
Date: 12:49:37 01/26/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2006 at 15:31:03, Günther Simon wrote: >On January 26, 2006 at 13:59:45, Albert Silver wrote: > >>On January 26, 2006 at 13:54:32, chandler yergin wrote: >> >>>Well it's WRONG! >>>New game, >>>[D]B2k4/KPpP4/n1Pb4/P5p1/5p2/5P2/8/8 b - - 0 1 >>> >>>Analysis by Shredder 8: >>> >>>1. -+ (-1.81): 1...Nb8 2.Kxb8 Bc5 3.a6 g4 4.a7 Bd6 5.fxg4 >>>2. +- (#8): 1...Ke7 2.Kxa6 Kf6 3.d8Q+ Be7 4.Qh8+ Ke6 5.b8Q Bf6 6.Qb3+ Ke5 7.Qb2+ >>>Kd5 8.Qhxf6 g4 9.Qbd4# >>>3. +- (#7): 1...Bf8 2.Kxa6 Ke7 3.b8Q Kf7 4.d8Q Be7 5.Qg8+ Kf6 6.Qbb3 >>>4. +- (#7): 1...Bc5+ 2.Kxa6 Ke7 3.b8Q Kf6 4.d8Q+ Be7 5.Qh8+ Kf5 6.Qbc8+ Kg6 >>>7.Qhg8+ Kh5 8.Qh3# >>> >>>(, 26.01.2006) >> >>I'm a bit confused. You didn't even show Shredder finding the mate after Nb8. >>You only showed it was capable of finding the mate if Black played a weaker move >>than Nb8. How long does it take to see the mate after Black plays the more >>resilient Nb8? >> >> Albert > > >For the same analysis in this thread he says once 'VERY IMPRESSIVE! GOOD >PROGRAM!'(TheKing) and the next time 'Well it's WRONG!' ;-) (AnMon) >And after this contradictory answers he presents a completely >irrelevant Shredder multi variation analysis which only gives an advantage >for Black... >Well what should we think about this? > >Guenther http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?482398 Think what ya want... ;) Cut me some slack man...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.