Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 18:32:51 01/26/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2006 at 17:51:47, chandler yergin wrote: >On January 26, 2006 at 17:07:23, Albert Silver wrote: > >>On January 26, 2006 at 16:28:02, chandler yergin wrote: >> >>>On January 26, 2006 at 16:05:06, Albert Silver wrote: >>> >>>>On January 26, 2006 at 15:45:57, chandler yergin wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 26, 2006 at 13:59:45, Albert Silver wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On January 26, 2006 at 13:54:32, chandler yergin wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Well it's WRONG! >>>>>>>New game, >>>>>>>[D]B2k4/KPpP4/n1Pb4/P5p1/5p2/5P2/8/8 b - - 0 1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Analysis by Shredder 8: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>1. -+ (-1.81): 1...Nb8 2.Kxb8 Bc5 3.a6 g4 4.a7 Bd6 5.fxg4 >>>>>>>2. +- (#8): 1...Ke7 2.Kxa6 Kf6 3.d8Q+ Be7 4.Qh8+ Ke6 5.b8Q Bf6 6.Qb3+ Ke5 7.Qb2+ >>>>>>>Kd5 8.Qhxf6 g4 9.Qbd4# >>>>>>>3. +- (#7): 1...Bf8 2.Kxa6 Ke7 3.b8Q Kf7 4.d8Q Be7 5.Qg8+ Kf6 6.Qbb3 >>>>>>>4. +- (#7): 1...Bc5+ 2.Kxa6 Ke7 3.b8Q Kf6 4.d8Q+ Be7 5.Qh8+ Kf5 6.Qbc8+ Kg6 >>>>>>>7.Qhg8+ Kh5 8.Qh3# >>>>>>> >>>>>>>(, 26.01.2006) >>>>>> >>>>>>I'm a bit confused. You didn't even show Shredder finding the mate after Nb8. >>>>>>You only showed it was capable of finding the mate if Black played a weaker move >>>>>>than Nb8. How long does it take to see the mate after Black plays the more >>>>>>resilient Nb8? >>>>>> >>>>>> Albert >>>>> Hi Al, My old friend. >>>>>I been drinkin... I for get things, Sometimes I for get I forget things.. >>>>> >>>>>You should know I forget things... If ya can't remenber I forget things, >>>>> >>>>>Ya have a Sobriety Problem.. in which case I can recommend some good Irish >>>>>Whiskey... >>>>> >>>>>But to the point, yes, you are right. If White plays the 'Best move' >>>>>does Black hav a Win? >>>>> >>>>>I dunno.... >>>>> >>>>>Here is my Analysis.. or rather (Computer Analysis) >>>>> >>>>>I won't argue with that. O. K.? >>>>> >>>>>New game, >>>>>[D]B2k4/KPpP4/n1Pb4/P5p1/5p2/5P2/8/8 b - - 0 1 >>>>> >>>>>Analysis by Shredder 8: >>>>> >>>>>1...Nb8 2.Kxb8 Bc5 3.a6 g4 4.a7 Ke7 5.fxg4 f3 6.Kxc7 Bxa7 7.b8Q Bxb8+ 8.Kxb8 Kd8 >>>>>9.g5 f2 10.g6 f1Q 11.g7 Qb1+ 12.Ka7 Qg1+ 13.Kb7 Qxg7 >>>>>-+ (-5.41) Depth: 33/56 00:06:37 82845kN, tb=15015 >>>>>(, 26.01.2006) >>>>> >>>>>So, In your opinion, does this mean that Black does NOT have a Win in 20? >>>>> >>>>>It certainly means the (other guy) could not possible found a Win for Black >>>>>in 3 seconds) >>>> >>>>It could find it. This sort of phenomenon of an engine finding something in a >>>>second while others take minutes is nothing new. it's just one of those quirks. >>>>It only proves that Shredder 8 is one of the slow ones as well. It no doubt just >>>>needs more time. >>> >>>Make him Post the Analysis! Otherwise it's all BS! >> >>He did: http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?482351 >> >> Albert >> >Wheres't trhe MATE! >It's a frigging "Evaluation!" >DON'T YA GET IT? > > Do you get this: I suspect the next ban is going to last until the earth stops spinning. Speaking for the moderators, we are pretty well tired of this nonsense. You are back one day and going nuts again. This time will be the final time for this group of moderators. The above analysis clearly shows a mate score, and a PV that leads to mate. Take your nonsense somewhere else and keep it there. > > >>> >>>You Know it! I know it! For others they are living in Laa Laa land! >>> >>>Delusional! >>>Period!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.