Author: Joseph Ciarrochi
Date: 01:27:18 01/27/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2006 at 04:15:51, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >On January 27, 2006 at 00:31:43, Joseph Ciarrochi wrote: > >>The CCC does not seem to have as much interest in talking about Fritz 9, >>compared to other chess engines (Rybka, fruit 2.2.1, and hiarcs ). I wonder why >>this is? Fritz 9 seems to be one of the few programs that consistently gives >>rybka some problems and is probably the number 2 or 3 engine on a single >>processor. It's pretty darn strong. > >I am in the process of making an opening book for Rybka based on what i have >observed in Rybka so far in terms of strengths and weaknesses and i am testing >Rybka beta 12 against Frizt 9 with this book at 90 min + 30 seconds per move >ponder=off and 256 Mb hash each Fritz uses it's own native book Fritz9.ctg, P4 >2.8 1 Gb ram and after 13 games (out of a 100) this is the score: > > 1234567890123 >1 Rybka 1.01 Beta 12 32-bit 1111101½½1111 >2 Fritz 9 0000010½½0000 > >It seems like with an opening book that is tuned for it's play Rybka is in a >league of it's own, well it is without too, but you get the point :) > >Regards >Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.