Author: Tord Romstad
Date: 04:49:23 01/27/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2006 at 06:32:29, Antonio Redael wrote: >Hi, > >Glaurung 102 seems to be a rather strong free engine. Are there any results? Hi Antonio, Thanks for your interest. I am not aware of any results for Glaurung 1.0.2, but there are plenty of results for the almost identical 1.0.1. The strength seems to be on roughly the same level as Naum, WildCat, Ruffian, Gandalf, SlowChess and ProDeo. I am too lazy to locate all the many test results I have seen, but you can have a look at the CEGT and UEL rating lists: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/cegtrating4040best.html http://perso.wanadoo.fr/lefouduroi/tournois/uci/uel_rating.htm As you can see, it is not close to the top programs, but hey, it's free. :-) >What about Tablebase settings? Tablebases are not supported, and probably never will be. Glaurung is released under the GNU Public License, which is not compatible with the Nalimov EGTB code. Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.