Author: Günther Simon
Date: 06:35:25 01/27/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2006 at 08:58:06, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >This is a very good question. If it concerned Rybka Beta so and so everybody and >Vasik would declare that this were still a bug. But of course all the other >engines are actually NOT tested in public so that this looks like a stupidity. That's nonsense, just do some forum search here. F9 was quite good tested and is still tested. BTW there exist probably other fora too, which don't 'suppress' F9 results ;-) >In fact Fritz simply overlooked that Black can sac a piece for that the e-Pawn >can run into a new Q. So 81.Kh6 was BS. No, White was already lost before move 81. White was already in zugzwang before and it is simply about good Knight vs. bad Bishop. >That opens the possibility to sac on f5 No, the possibilty exists completely independent from 81.Kh6 >after the g4 has been taken. It's just a little bit of code that is lacking >here. But Frans Morsch cant recruit "500 testers" just like that. The eval of >Fritz is perfect and Draw should be the result. The eval was of course not perfect and therefore the result was _not_ a draw... Actually a perfect eval will very likely _never_ exist. >Black cant take on e4 because >then d6+. So, if you want - the decisive moment for the advantage of Rybka is >something connected with free Pawns and sccing a piece for letting run the >Pawns. For us humans a piece of cake.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.